 |
Book Reviews of Freakonomics [Revised and Expanded]: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of EverythingBook Review: a quick fun read with pointers to more in depth research Summary: 5 StarsThis is a popular and fun to read introduction to some economics ideas applied to a random selection of subjects. If this piques your interest, the back of the book has a bibliography of the related research so you can read more in depth. See also The Undercover Economist.
Book Review: On Freakonomics... Summary: 5 StarsEconomics is not always one of the most interesting and enjoyable subject matters around. However, Freakonomics dispels that notion and brings lots of enjoyable quality to the subject. Whether you agree with his points or not, this book will make you think and want to analyze the supposed "conventional" wisdom of our society and how we function.
A lot of the points in the book make complete sense, but it's not as if an agenda is being pushed on you. It forces you to think about the issues that he presents and challenges you to think: Do you buy this? He presents interesting issues that are controversial and his writing opens up debate and questioning to econ nuts and non-economists alike.
I really enjoyed the book and couldn't put it down. I give it 5/5 because it is one of the more interesting books I've read and Levitt writes as if he's in a conversation with you by offering unique perspectives on topics we have already sort of formulated a generic and typical response too...
5/5
Book Review: Great book, but read with care Summary: 5 StarsThis is a fascinating and readable book that offers an interesting perspective on that which we, the general public, generally accept as the truth. In fact, it is so readable that one must take caution not to fall into the trap of believing the authors' claims based merely on the fast and enjoyable writing style that tends to lull critical thinking skills to sleep and make a person feel smart simply for having read the book. Moreover, the spirit of the book, a deliberate thumbing of the nose towards existing beliefs surrounding usually serious subjects such as abortion, crime, drug dealers, parenting, and cheating, leads to a sense of optimism for the authors' cause. Frequently, one finds one's self wanting to believe everything in this book because it is so enjoyable to read. Bearing this in mind, Freakonomonics is a worthwhile book with a unique perspective on a variety of topics.
While Levitt and Dubner's arguments are not without supporting facts, there is room for counterpoint on most of the topics that get examined. Still, the book's approach of assaulting the mountains of data supporting years of conventional wisdom with simple observations about incentives and human nature is consistently effective. Also in the authors' defense, many of the ideas put forth are frequently offensive to a broad range of people. For example, the most talked about idea in the book, the notion that the drop in crime during the mid 1990's is a result of legalized abortion, offends conservative types because it appears to be an argument in favor of abortion. Liberals take offense to this notion because it suggests that a significant number of abortions are performed on poor inept mothers-to-be and much of late twentieth century urban crime has been the result of their parental incompetence. Whether or not the argument is correct, and there is some reasonable evidence presented in the book to suggest that it might be, the authors are not pandering to any particular group for fast and easy support and openly tell the reader on more than one occasion that what lies ahead is not for the squeamish.
Ultimately, this book succeeds because it has a genuine point that is correct and works as a common thread that runs through the variety of topics. The point is that conventional wisdom is frequently wrong. Specifically it is wrong because it is founded upon statistics which are based on correlations which often get confused with cause. And correlation and cause are not the same thing - because something indicates something else does not mean that same something causes that same something else. An example from the book tells of a government program basing a free book distribution program on the strong positive correlation between student reading scores and the quantity of books in student homes. The book distribution program was a failure because it mistook the quantity of books in the student homes as a cause of higher student reading scores rather than a correlation - smarter families like to read more, hence they have books in their homes. Simply increasing the quantity of books in a home will not make a child read more, or at a higher level. This example is typical of the ideas and arguments that permeate this book. Again, the authors are up front about the fact that a good deal of the material is not for the easily offended.
This is a tricky book to evaluate. On one hand, it is as "five-star" a book as has ever been written regarding its page-turner writing style - think Da Vince Code in the world of non-fiction and economics. On the other hand, it could be penalized for perhaps trying to use that writing style to sneak one by the reader. Ultimately, this book ends up as strongly recommended. The reason for which is this: The idea for this book started out as a controversial graduate thesis in Economics by one of the authors, Stephen Levitt. The fact that it was controversial should be enough to indicate that the material has its merits, some of which get discussed in the book. The fact that someone managed to make something so enjoyable and interesting to read out of an Economics thesis, while maintaining integrity, is enough to warrant high praise from the most cynical critic - read it, keep your guard up, and enjoy it - 5 stars.
Book Review: It's OK Summary: 2 StarsBefore I read this book, I was told that it was the most thought provoking piece of literature in the last decade. Everyone I talked to raved about it, and said that the way they look at things will be forever changed. This is a slight exaggeration, but not far from my actual experience.
After reading this book and being thoroughly disappointed, I have to ask the question - Have you actually ever thought about these issues before? If you had, Levitt's answers would seem pretty obvious... The book isn't bad per say, but it definitely is not worthy of praise. Seriously people, let's think about it. Drownings are more common than accidental gun shots? How many pools are there in America versus hand guns? How much more likely are small children to play at a pool without being supervised? Shocked? Hardly.
If you have thought about any of these issues before, the book is not worth your time, energy, or money.
Book Review: On the occasion of being the 1,498th review, what can I say that has not already been said. I'll give it a try... Summary: 5 StarsI was expecting an above average economics book - you know, a few graphs, some discussion of fed policy and GATT. I was expecting a bit of a forced read.
Happily, none of that "boring stuff" appears in the book. To quote one of my old econ professors, this book focuses on an "economic way of thinking" rather than economics per se.
Rest assured, this is a fun, informative read. It's the kind of book that drives my wife nuts because I just had to start telling her about some of the things Levitt and Dubner wrote about. This one is well worth your time.
More Freakonomics [Revised and Expanded]: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything reviews: First Review 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Newest Review
|
 |