 |
Book Reviews of Vietnam: A HistoryBook Review: The Best Research Book on Vietnam Summary: 5 Stars
This book was required reading for a class on the Vietnam War at the University of Nebraska. Excellent research vehicle to understand the backround of Vietnam and its trials and tribulations. Starts from the begining and takes you thru the American Vietnam War with an even keel look with a middle of the road written word.
I still use it as a reference while writing my book about the Vietnam War during 1968-69. This book should be read first, before any other Vietnam book, to lay the ground work for all the other Vietnam books that follow.
LB 68-69
Book Review: The Best of the Best on the Vietnam War Summary: 5 Stars
As is related in the beginning of this book, Vietnam: A History is well read in Vietnam today--probablly due to the fact-based, unbiased, reporting style the author uses.The book is split into two divisions. The first, containing a vast history of Vietnam, which can be laborious to get through, yet for history buffs, worth the effort. Second, the Vietnam War. It is the second part of the book which will leave the readers awed by the ineptness and corruption of U.S. & South Vietnamese leadership--both military and political, especially at top levels--angry by the uninformedness of the American people, and shocked by the great cost in lives and property to two warring groups, whose involvement and happening was entirely preventable. Probably no other person was, or is better qualified to write the Vietnam story than Stanley Karnow, who lived in Paris in the 1950's, as a U.S. foreign news correspondent during France's fight for dominance in Vietnam. He also interviewed numerous key participants. He dug into once classifed U.S. documents to reveal unknown information, and he researched and reported on the recollections of high-level polticians, dignataries, military leaders, and the soldiers, men, and women who fought on both sides. An outstanding work! I'd recommed reading "Paris in the Fifties" by the same author as a primer to this book.
Book Review: The Definitive Book on the Vietnam War Summary: 5 Stars
Part-history book, part-personal memoir, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Stanley Karnow does a superb job of telling the story of the biggest American foreign policy disaster of the 20th century. Vietnam was his beat from the death of the first American soldier there in 1959 until after the 1973 ceasefire that ended U.S. involvement. He interviewed almost all of the major players in the war and was there while the story unfolded.
This book isn't a complete history of Vietnam (history, culture, economics, sociology, etc.). Instead it covers in great detail the U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, plus the origins of Vietnamese nationalism, which stems from their many battles with Chinese and French colonialism throughout the centuries.
Although I consider myself a history buff, Karnow surprised me with new details about the war. For example, the Tet Offensive of 1968 decimated the Vietcong and didn't affect U.S. public opinion nearly as much as people would have you believe. Also, the notorious Christmas bombing of 1972 largely spared urban areas of Hanoi and Haiphong--it wasn't the second Hiroshima I'd been led to believe. And JFK wasn't the first U.S. president to get America involved in Vietnam...that was Harry Truman's fault, although FDR got his fingers dirty a little bit.
Contrary to some of the other reviewers, I didn't find this book to be pro-Communist. Karnow gives a fair portrayal of both sides. He spends more time discussing North Vietnam's "insane" economic policies and the Communist massacre of civilians at Hué in 1968 than he does any U.S. atrocities (e.g., My Lai). And I was impressed by his descriptions of bravery on both sides of the conflict. This is no mean feat for someone that was placed on Richard Nixon's "enemies list" (as Karnow was).
If Karnow spends a lot of time discussing the arrogance and naivete of U.S. politicians and generals as well as the rampant corruption and incompetence of South Vietnam's leaders...well those were big reasons the Communists won, folks. And the parallels to Iraq today are striking.
Two last things:
1. Have a dictionary handy when reading this book.
2. This book is a little out-of-date: John McCain and John Kerry are described as "two members of Congress with impeccable war records." Ladies and gents, meet Karl Rove!
Book Review: The Definitive History of the Vietnam War Summary: 5 Stars
I first read Stanley Karnow's Vietnam: A History when it was first published, some 16 years ago. Since then I have read numerous other accounts of the Vietnam War, and Karnow's remains my favorite. It is the most interesting, most informative book on this conflict I have read.
Book Review: The best history on Vietnam I've read Summary: 5 Stars
The author looks at Vietnam from an interesting perspective. Providing a useful background on Vietnamese history, with periods of domination from and resistance to, outsiders, the book helps the reader understand the depth of the nationalism which the United States found itself pitted against.
Some may argue that this book is too apologetic to the communist regime based out of Hanoi. No matter who writes a book on this subject, people with strong feelings either way may feel that the author provided a biased view. My perception from reading the book was that the author's objective was to understand Vietnam, not further any social agenda.
Americans will debate the terrible conflict in Vietnam for decades to come. American history and Vietnamese history inter-mingled in ways that were unanticipated and unfortunate. Until someone produces a more definitive and balanced look at Vietnam, this book will continue to be the standard.
I welcome feedback on this and all reviews at wstrnlibwarrior@yahoo.com
More Vietnam: A History reviews: First Review 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
|
 |