While America Aged: How Pension Debts Ruined General Motors, Stopped the NYC Subways, Bankrupted San Diego, and Loom as the Next Financial Crisis by Roger Lowenstein Summary and Reviews
|
List Price: Our Price: $2.25 You Save: $23.70 (91%) Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Buy Used: from $2.15 (click here) Category: Book See more book details and other editions |
|---|
Book Reviews of While America Aged: How Pension Debts Ruined General Motors, Stopped the NYC Subways, Bankrupted San Diego, and Loom as the Next Financial Crisis
Book Review: Why aren't the people on Capital Hill reading this?
Summary: 5 Stars
I really hope that our government officials don't fall for the double-talk from the automobile manufacturers begging for a a handout, with the ongoing financial crises ripping across America.
This book gives you one good reason the government shouldn't bail out GM, or any of the other automakers. The [retired] and working union members of the UAW have nothing to fear (yet) since they're the ones sucking these companies dry with their greed, laziness and apathy for the dire economic events happening as I comment on this book.
Get rid of the Unions! They are one of the biggest reasons for the downhill economic slide our country is taking.
Book Review: informative or persuasive? depends on your perspective
Summary: 2 Stars
A book like this is meant to be informative and persuasive. The problem is that there really isn't a clear demarcation line between the two ideas. It seems to rely a great deal on the predisposition of the reader himself. I suppose that to a greater or lesser extent this is true with all writing, what makes this book so obvious in it's informative-persuasive spectrum is that i don't agree with the author's basic ideas and i find things like his choice of words irritating and as a result wonder outloud not "is he right?", but "what is he hiding from me?".
It's a curious phenomena that i'd like to take a minute to think about and to try to explain. The author is very conservative, both politically and socially. this shows up in things like name calling and a dismissive attitude towards ideas like socialism or state intervention in the marketplace. For instance, the radical labor unions are so obviously wrong that their ideas aren't worth taking seriously, even for a moment, the only thing to do is see how they used power historically and block their influence in the future.
I can see things like word choice, name calling, dismissive attitude. What i can not see, without repeating what is a considerable amount of research that the author has brought to the book, is the choice of ideas. Intellectual battles are fought (the book details their outward appearan ces), and the streams of thoughtfulness that lead up to them (this is where the book falls completely flat, in the explanations in ideology that drives the people). All i can see is what the author thought valuable and of enough worth to mention, and i know he is blind to the value of anything left of center (so to speak). So what happens is that his reporting seems to boil down to a blow by blow power struggle like a boxing match, not a waltz of competing ideas (which is what i envision history to be).
Is his major idea worthwhile? are pension demands bankrupting companies and cities? probably. but i already thought that before i got the book, which is why i invested the time to read it. My interest was in finding out why and how, what competing ideas won out, and which lost. None of which i really learned from the book. what i learned what that a very conservative person looks at the world in a very specific way, a rather unnuanced way that really misses what i think are really big issues.
Book Review: Friendly advice for progressives
Summary: 5 Stars
For progressives who know nothing about the author, they might take the three descriptions of pension debacles in this book as an indictment of things the left generally supports such as strong unions and pensions for workers. However, if one examines his solutions at the end of the book, it is clear Lowenstein is center-left and progressives would be wise to heed his advice.
In short, the book describes what happened to retirement systems for employees of General Motors, New York City's Metropolitan Transit Authority and the city of San Diego. His exquisite detail shows how time and time again unions piled demand on top of demand and a GM management flush with cash or weak-kneed elected officials agreed to pension enhancements that later hobbled their entities.
At least in GM's case, one could argue that the deals were cut before real problems began to occur and the problem was not so much with the initial agreements as with the inability to alter them once they became unaffordable. In the case of San Diego, the train went off the rails well before the public discovered how bad things had become because elected officials tried to hide the problem while they made decisions that compounded it.
Lowenstein suggests solutions that many progressives would endorse, such as universal health care coverage and stronger regulation and support for pension systems. However, progressives should also heed the message that union demands can become excessive and when they do, they should be resisted.
Book Review: Buy This Book
Summary: 5 Stars
I bought this book after reading an excerpt from it in Smart Money Magazine. It was easy to read, interesting, and educational. I felt that it was unbiased since it showed how everyone has some blame for the pension crisis.Book Review: Too much historical detail and not enough analysis of solutions
Summary: 4 Stars
The author examines 3 organizations......1 in the private sector (GM) and 2 in the public sector (NY Transit and City of San Diego) with respects to their pension plans and their financial health.
The case of GM is fairly well publicized. In early 2008, Business Week ran an article predicting that GM and Ford really have no choice but to declare bankruptcy...to eliminate their pension plan obligations by passing them along to the US taxpayers. As the author points out, GM went from being one of the most profitable companies in the world paying out good dividends to shareholders......to a money losing HMO on wheels.
All 3 cases have the same basic theme of management focusing on short term cash flow and ignoring the long term impact of pension obligations. The only caveat to this general theme is that San Diego threw in dishonesty of elected officials. I had not heard the "Enron-by-the-Sea" story of San Diego before.
The author's solution to our private and public pension dilemma is:
1. Nationalized health care with partial payment by the worker.
2. Keep Medicare for 65 and over people (but it has huge unresolved liabilities)
3. Keep Social Security but shift from pay as you go to government savings accounts.
4. Retirement plans should offer more annuity payout options (but the author forgets to point out that annuities offered by Wall Street have extremely high 2% expense ratios).
5. Create and enforce law that public pensions must be fully funded at all times.
I found the book to be too long and boring. I am not that interested in every little bit of history that created the problems at the three institutions. I would have rather had less historical detail......and more focus on pros and cons of alternative solutions to the pension problem.
If you are interesting in accumulating more assets so you are less dependent on our pension system, I would suggest reading some of the books noted below.
Index Mutual Funds: How to Simplify Your Financial Life and Beat the Pro's
The Richest Man in Babylon
Bogle on Mutual Funds: New Perspectives for the Intelligent Investor
The Millionaire Next Door
The Four Pillars of Investing: Lessons for Building a Winning Portfolio
A Random Walk Down Wall Street: The Time-Tested Strategy for Successful Investing, Ninth Edition
The Coffeehouse Investor: How to Build Wealth, Ignore Wall Street, and Get On With Your Life
The Bogleheads' Guide to Investing